<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>haven &#8211; The Mind Unleashed</title>
	<atom:link href="https://themindunleashed.com/tag/haven/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://themindunleashed.com</link>
	<description>News - Health - Science - Media - Exploration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Illusion Quotient</title>
		<link>https://themindunleashed.com/2017/07/the-illusion-quotient.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Torres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[york]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://themindunleashed.com/?p=18531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What intelligence quotient? Is there really a finely honed merit based tool for identifying the best and the brightest society has to offer? Like, off the top of your head: what is a neuron? How many neurons does the human brain have and what if we didn’t have any? Human brains on average have 86 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What intelligence quotient? Is there really a finely honed merit based tool for identifying the best and the brightest society has to offer? Like, off the top of your head: what is a <a href="https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-neuron-2794890" target="_blank" rel="noopener">neuron</a>? How many neurons does the human brain have and what if we didn’t have any?</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18545" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/basebrainBor3.jpg" alt="" width="710" height="338" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/basebrainBor3.jpg 710w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/basebrainBor3-300x143.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 710px) 100vw, 710px" /></p>
<p>Human brains on average have 86 billion neurons. If we didn’t have any we’d be a sponge which have zero… Interestingly we were taught different until someone questioned it? In 2005 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzana_Herculano-Houzel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr Suzana Herculano-Houzel</a> discovered that although 100 billion was used in all the science text books and journals they were all wrong. None of her colleagues knew where that figure came from so she set upon discovering the true figure. After <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/feb/28/how-many-neurons-human-brain" target="_blank" rel="noopener">liquefying human brains she then counted the neurons</a> using a formula.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-18541 alignleft" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Herculano3.jpg" alt="" width="257" height="170" /></p>
<p>It’s the same with intelligence &#8211; with so many different definitions what we actually have are educated opinions. Intelligence is a formally recognized, organized and categorized structure of human perception. “Catching on, making sense of things or figuring things out” are three characteristics most experts agree on. “Reasoning, learning from mistakes and abstract thinking” are some others. Then there’s the ability to make sense of it all and translate that. The time it takes between individuals is of course taken into account.</p>
<p>Age and its association with either intelligence or wisdom are misleading and constrained understandings of both. After all Einstein was a 25 year old patent clerk when his <em>“Theory of General Relativity”</em> created shockwaves around the world. He was quoted as saying: “The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.” He also said: <em>&#8220;A person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so&#8221;</em> however the heyday of the twenty something physics genius is gone… Today’s <a href="http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/laureates_ages/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">average age for Nobel Prize winners</a> in physics is 50 and over 65 for writers.</p>
<p>As with all good mainstream science we can dissect it, wrap it in a multitude of statistics, facts, figures and BS &#8211; then stick it into our textbooks. Now really much of the knowledge we retain is on a need to know basis not overcomplexity. Do most of us need to know what a <a href="http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/synapse" target="_blank" rel="noopener">synapse</a>, a neuron or quantum tunneling is? Tesla said:<em> “Today&#8217;s scientists have <a href="https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/n/nikolatesl401270.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">substituted mathematics</a> for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”</em> Tesla was hands on &#8211; believing much of theoretical physics lacked observed reality. It’s the reason why we can read dozens of different theories on its nature with none being real.</p>
<p>Speaking of real, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_Adult_Intelligence_Scale" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WAIS-IV</a>, is the current test by which we measure IQ but it has many critics who say the tests are easy to manipulate. Much of this is done in the US as a means to a predetermined outcome. If I asked you why electrons don’t fly out of their orbits of the nucleus of an atom what would your answer be? This issue alone is too complex for the scope of this article because it indicts the entire educational system. How all tests are structured determines the outcome. Determines steering allocations of educational resources including federal discretionary funds. Besides there are plenty of books on the subject.</p>
<p>So then that aside, how smart are you in actual mind power? As of this writing the <a href="http://www.therichest.com/top-lists/top-250-richest-people-in-the-world/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">top three richest</a> people in the world are each worth upward of 70 billion US. If we based intelligence on income most of the rest of the world would be mental microbes. If artistic talent were our measure, we would come to the realization that some of history’s finest artists died paupers.</p>
<p>Most top scientists will never win a Nobel Prize and live otherwise ordinary lives outside of being extraordinarily smart. The same can be said of many religious scholars like St Augustine whose writing is thought provoking and meticulous. In fact some of the most brain draining reads I’ve ever experienced involved philosophy which uses language to transcend mortal thought.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class=" wp-image-18542 aligncenter" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Eniac.jpg" alt="" width="873" height="306" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Eniac.jpg 485w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Eniac-300x105.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 873px) 100vw, 873px" /></p>
<p>Above: ENIAC was 8.5 by 3 by 80 feet and weighed 27 tons.</p>
<p>Now here’s something I was thinking about: Arguably the first computer unveiled on February 14, 1946 was the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENIAC" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ENIAC</a> aka <em>“The Big Brain.”</em> The <a href="https://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/701/701_intro.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">IBM-701</a> went public in 1953 and could do 16 thousand OPS (Operations Per Second). Today Intel’s fastest desktop CPU can do over 300 billion OPS. Today’s fastest supercomputer is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunway_TaihuLight" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sunway TaihuLight</a> which has a speed of 93 petaFLOPS or 93 quadrillion OPS. So we’ve gone from 16 thousand to 93 quadrillion OPS in around 60 years. We might then conclude that these increases will continue exponentially and computers will shortly surpass the entire human collective in processing power.</p>
<p>While web searching even my most obscure concepts I came to an epiphany. We &#8211; the human race have unknowingly taken the next step in our evolution. Where in the past we could work on problems or ideas collectively, we couldn’t do it in real-time. Now we can almost instantly access and filter trillions of ideas and bits of data contributed by hundreds of millions of minds working virtually as one.</p>
<p>What also struck me is how rapidly <em>“AI”</em> (artificial intelligence) is advancing. Autonomous AI internet search bots will soon understand the content they gather using <em>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_consciousness" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AC</a>”</em> (Artificial Consciousness). Entire libraries will be read in seconds on quantum scales. These synthetic entities will be our greatest thinkers, inventors, designers, physicists, philosophers, physicians… They’ll access databases containing all the knowledge from the history of human existence. Only, as it may take humans years to go from concept to result, for AI we may be talking minutes.</p>
<p>Somewhere around here a metaphoric event horizon occurs as was predicted by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Lilly" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. John Lilly</a> in his 1978 book <em>“The Scientist”</em> talking about <em>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_consciousness" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Solid State Intelligence.</a>”</em> Our machines will become self-reliant eventually controlling human thought through timeline manipulation. They’ll guarantee their own creation, evolution and man’s dependency on them. This for me was incredible – we came to the same exact conclusion years apart.<strong><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-18539" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tes-lil-bos-musk1.jpg" alt="" width="853" height="273" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tes-lil-bos-musk1.jpg 500w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tes-lil-bos-musk1-300x96.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 853px) 100vw, 853px" /></strong></p>
<p>Philosopher <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/03/ai_expert_nick_bostrom_talks_to_el_reg/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nick Bostrom</a> suggests that if one were living in a virtual world it would be indistinguishable from a <em>“REAL”</em> one. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Elon Musk</a> like many others agree and fears we may already be living in a simulation meaning the change event already occurred. Contrary to popular belief this idea of reality being an illusion predates antiquity. It did not start with Bostrom nor with the Lillys of the world – everyone’s in on this game. Science or theology as in the Christian <em>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omphalos_hypothesis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Omphalos</a>”</em> hypothesis which presents that God created the world ten thousand years ago. The universe was already complete with stars, planets, Adam and Eve. Much like a well written simulated world program.</p>
<p>So now here we are in a simulation? However we exist, it’s real enough to us. Speaking of what’s real, we’ve touched upon wealth, talent, religion, philosophy, science… but the question was: <em>“How smart are you?”</em> The truth is that it doesn’t really matter because the quotient is an illusion. It measures what a committee decides intelligence is at any given point in time. This usually involves political and cultural interpretations. It doesn’t mean you’ll suddenly be good at math or will now create a great symphony. It means that like millions of others you’ll pass or like <strong>Steve Jobs</strong>, <strong>Bill Gates </strong>and<strong> Mark Zuckerberg</strong> all University dropouts you can still go on to change the world…</p>
<p><em>Written by the author Robert Torres. <a href="http://RTR-Publishing.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://RTR-Publishing.com</a> <a href="https://about.me/towers3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://about.me/towers3</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone conducted a study to see if someone from the future was here present in our time. Here&#8217;s what they found.</title>
		<link>https://themindunleashed.com/2015/08/someone-conducted-a-study-to-see-if-someone-from-the-future-was-here-present-in-our-time-heres-what-they-found.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Torres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigm Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexplained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[york]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://themindunleashed.com/?p=7629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did you know that there was a study conducted to see if someone from the future was here present in our time? Yes, it’s true! Astrophysicists &#8211; Robert Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson at Michigan Tech University did just that as reported in 2014. They figured that if someone from the future traveled back to our [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Did you know that there was a <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7128" target="_blank" rel="noopener">study conducted</a> to see if someone from the future was here present in our time? Yes, it’s true! Astrophysicists &#8211; Robert Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson at Michigan Tech University did just that as reported in 2014. They figured that if someone from the future traveled back to our time, there may be trace evidence. Someone may have done internet searches of future events. The search dates would have been prior to the events and would stand out that way. Enough of them traced to one user would reveal a pattern of advanced knowledge.</p>
<p>After exhausting their funds, the results of that study remained inconclusive. However, in response to a question posted on one website asking: <em>“Do you believe communication through time would be possible?”</em> I replied that <em>“I believe it has already happened.”</em> Only because I believe that our near future thinkers will be quantum computers with artificial intelligence. I believe that not only would they be able to figure it out, but man has figured it out already.</p>
<p>What? Yes, what we once believed to be impossible is already proven science fact. So although this is complicated, I’ll simplify what’s involved for you. Hopefully the science behind it will become easy to understand. Now I want you to keep in mind that it concerns faster than light communication called “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_communication" target="_blank" rel="noopener">superluminal</a>” which Einstein dismissed as impossible. Although being one of the discoverers of this phenomena he dismissed it because it violated his own speed limit of light. According to Einstein, nothing in the universe could travel faster. Communication through time however also violates another law called <em>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality" target="_blank" rel="noopener">causality</a>.”</em> The law of causality simply means that any event must have a cause and the cause must happen before the event.</p>
<p>As an example, I often use a glass of milk: I drop a glass of milk, it falls to the floor and breaks, spilling the milk. Then you see and hear it fall from the <em>cause</em> of me dropping it in the first place.</p>
<p>You could never see it break before I dropped it because time as we experience it occurs from past to future. This is called the arrow of time or “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Eddington’s Arrow</a>” named after Sir Arthur Eddington who coined the phrase in 1927. It drops, falls to the floor, it breaks and then you see it. All one straight line from the past to the future.But many paranormal phenomena like supernatural abilities which many throughout history have claimed to possess are based on violating these laws. ESP, telekinesis, precognition and many other psi abilities do just that. Many famous psychics like the late <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Edgar Cayce</a> claimed to leave his body to retrieve information from the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Akashic Record</a> which goes by many other names. Some call it the Astral Planes, The Book of Life, universal consciousness, collective consciousness, etc… It is what some believe makes psychic abilities possible.</p>
<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-7639" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library.jpg" alt="library" width="751" height="373" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library.jpg 1152w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library-300x149.jpg 300w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library-1024x508.jpg 1024w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/library-768x381.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 751px) 100vw, 751px" /></a></p>
<p>According to Akashic Records theory, information has no time or distance barrier. Non-local or universal information resides outside of the mind where it is always available and can be tuned into like a radio. With some people like psychics it’s a natural right brain activity and with the population being majority left brain it may be something that can be learned. Although mainstream scientists reject all of these claims as fake or pseudo-science. For people like Edgar Cayce, Nostradamus and others alternative explanations like trickery, fraud and coincidence are the usual suspects.</p>
<p>Now, a funny thing happened on the way to the witch and it’s been happening more frequently lately. It started with atoms and accidents and now it’s routinely done on purpose. Once again peering down into subatomic particles is bringing two worlds together. Believing the impossible but approaching it from different directions.</p>
<p>Scientists have long noticed strange things going on with atoms, electrons and even now with larger molecule experiments. What Einstein used to call <em>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement" target="_blank" rel="noopener">spooky action at a distance</a>,”</em> is now routine. If you follow me I won’t go into depth and it’s really very simple. Say you have a molecule that consists of two atoms and each has one electron. Well, these electrons are spinning. One is spinning upward so the other electron has to be spinning in the opposite direction or downward. That’s the way it works because they are from the same molecule. In quantum physics they call this “entangled” meaning they will always be connected. The “spooky action” comes in when you pull them apart.</p>
<p>We’ll pull them apart in our minds but there are many methods in the real world to do this. Now, by taking a measurement of one electron we will destroy it, but we will know which direction it spins. Knowing which way it spins instantly tells us the direction the other is spinning without measuring it because they are a pair or connected (entangled). What’s weird is that we can separate them and put one in another room or even across town and it will still work. This is called wave collapse because by measuring one the spin direction of the other collapses to the exact opposite.</p>
<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/emtabngled.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7640" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/emtabngled.jpg" alt="emtabngled" width="750" height="375" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/emtabngled.jpg 750w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/emtabngled-300x150.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /></a></p>
<p>So what if we separated them by a hundred miles? The truth is, we could separate them by a million miles or a light year and as soon as we measure one it <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse" target="_blank" rel="noopener">collapses the wave</a> and the other one becomes fixed. So, measure the one in front of you and the other one instantly spins in the opposite direction. See that’s the problem Einstein had with it. The electrons communicate faster than light. One light year away it should have taken at least a year to communicate with the other electron, right?</p>
<p>What does all this have to do with communication from the future? Well, it has to do with the beginnings of figuring it all out and they’ve done it! Through entanglement not only can you separate electrons by distance but by time. Then, you can perform the same experiment in a different way and the electron you measure in the future will communicate back in time. Measure the spin next year and the one you have separated in front of you will collapse today to the exact opposite spin before you’ve even taken the measurement.</p>
<p>Since this is supposed to be an easy article to understand, let me tell you of the implications rather than how it’s done. It’s easy to understand but the article would have to be twice as long. There are different techniques with some straight forward and others overly involved. Creating what they call <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">qubits</a> is one way which is short for quantum bits and is a little more involved but I only mention it for anyone who wants to investigate this further.</p>
<p>Up until recently it was believed that any of this was useless because it couldn’t be used to transfer information through time. However, it is now believed that by setting up a coding system, communicating through binary is theoretically possible. So in theory I could send you next year’s newspaper headline back through time as binary. This is all in the early stages, but the science is solid. Entangled particles like electrons communicate not only faster than light, <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/156673-the-first-quantum-entanglement-of-photons-through-space-and-time" target="_blank" rel="noopener">they also break the time barrier</a>. One current theory is that the electrons communicate bypassing our space time dimension completely.</p>
<p>This is HUGE &#8211; it opens up not only communication possibilities but quantum computing possibilities. Meaning computers from the future may already be communicating with one another back through the internet and back through time. So, the original study at Michigan Technology may have actually been ahead of its time or behind its time or something that we may figure out or already have and don’t know it yet or whatever.</p>
<p><strong>This article was written using concepts from the non-fiction book “Sin Thesis” available at </strong><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sin-Thesis-Robert-Torres/dp/1500462136/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1407134752&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=sin+thesis" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Amazon</strong></a><strong> written by the author Robert Torres. </strong><strong><a href="https://about.me/Towers3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://about.me/Towers3</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synchronicity and the Secret of the Co-creator</title>
		<link>https://themindunleashed.com/2015/08/synchronicity-and-the-secret-of-the-co-creator.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Torres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspirational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encounter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sychronicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexplained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[york]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://themindunleashed.com/?p=7520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Synchronicity: is the experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated occurring together in a meaningful manner [to the observer]. To count as synchronicity, the events should be unlikely to occur together by chance. If you believe synchronicity is simply coincidence, then you haven’t read any of the top experts in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Sync-final-3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-7522" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Sync-final-3-300x174.jpg" alt="Sync final 3" width="693" height="401" /></a></p>
<p><strong><em>Synchronicity:</em></strong><em> is the experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated occurring together in a meaningful manner [to the observer]. To count as synchronicity, the events should be unlikely to occur together by chance.</em></p>
<p>If you believe synchronicity is simply coincidence, then you haven’t read any of the top experts in the field. The famous psychotherapist <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Carl_Jung" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Carl Gustav Jung </a>coined the term synchronicity in the 1920s to reference the alignment of universal forces with a person’s experiences.</p>
<p>These forces have been sought out for centuries in many spiritual traditions as a means of aligning with the “<a href="http://www.flowpower.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">flow</a>.” This usually takes years of disciplined meditation, study, ritual or by other means to navigate this journey toward a harmonic “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individuation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">individuation</a>.” To some the search is inward for the self, yet for others it’s an outward search for spirituality.</p>
<p><strong>My first experience with synchronicity</strong> was on March 21<sup>st</sup> at 3:03am which is the 3<sup>rd</sup> month, 3<sup>rd</sup> week, 3<sup>rd</sup> hour, 3<sup>rd</sup> minute or 3333, on the equinox and the moment of my birth. It was my alignment with the universal forces, the planet, space and time.</p>
<p>My awakening was also through no effort of my own and came by way of a <a href="http://disinfo.com/2015/04/alien-god-species-watchers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">supernatural encounter with an entity of light</a>. It began my involvement with and research into the metaphysical nature of reality &#8211; I became “enlightened.” Because of this I have an inherent understanding of many esoteric concepts like the flow, the spirit, one-ness and even divinity.</p>
<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Flow-3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-7524" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Flow-3-300x112.jpg" alt="Flow 3" width="693" height="259" srcset="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Flow-3-300x112.jpg 300w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Flow-3-768x287.jpg 768w, https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Flow-3.jpg 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 693px) 100vw, 693px" /></a><br />
My experiences are not entirely unique, but the way in which this window of understanding opened for me is. There was no journey, no explanation as to why &#8211; the knowledge was just revealed. Things that to many are never more than concepts and metaphors, I actually see as having real form. I’ve witnessed many paranormal phenomena unfold with me seemingly being the only connection. However, because of my earlier encounters I’ve never attributed much of it directly to myself. I’ve always sensed a presence around me. So unlike many others who seek the path, I feel that for some reason the source found me.</p>
<p>Being human however leaves me questioning: “Who or what is this presence?” Abilities like ESP, clairvoyance, telekinesis are all real along with the concepts of a sub-stratum or pre-space. But what is our connection?</p>
<p>In Jung’s book “<a href="http://www.metanexus.net/essay/wolfgang-pauli-carl-jung-and-acausal-connecting-principle-case-study-transdisciplinarity" target="_blank" rel="noopener">An Acausal Connecting Principle</a>” it is subjective meaning that connects us. Without an observer (YOU) there is no mind, no synchronicity, no meaning. Thoughts connected to events, mind connected to movements of matter, absent of a cause (acausal). Thinking something before it happens, remote viewing, telekinesis, where do these abilities come from? Since scientists don’t accept the mind as a cause. How then do we prove any of this?</p>
<p>I say that we are using a flawed science because it is incomplete. Physicist, <a href="http://tillerinstitute.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. William Tiller</a> proposes that consciousness is what’s missing from the equation. It’s the unifying integrator of all the individual constituents. Bohm says there is a hidden variable implying that neither relativity nor quantum mechanics should be accepted as a conclusive nor exclusive solution.</p>
<p>My research began with Carl Jung but for millennia prior to Jung man has experienced synchronicity. Theoretically it begins outside of our space-time in the flow where all knowledge exits and our material reality takes shape. It then unfolds into our dimension only to return back to the flow. This is described by David Bohms theory of “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the implicate order</a>.” However prior to synchronicity, ancient humanity used words like sympathy, harmony and unity.</p>
<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pioneers-Sync.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-7525" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pioneers-Sync-300x94.jpg" alt="Pioneers Sync" width="699" height="219" /></a><br />
In the fourth century B.C., the Greek philosopher Heraclitus viewed all things as being inter-related, nothing is isolated and that all things are linked. Similarly Hippocrates said: “There is ONE common flow, a common breathing. Everything is in sympathy.” A bond &#8211; and even between inanimate objects. A form of “animism” or the belief that all matter has consciousness. This is a classic idea whereby separateness is an illusion.</p>
<p>Now what you should know is that Jung had a lifelong interest in and many experiences with the paranormal. Working with him was the Nobel Prize winning physicist Wolfgang Pauli who also had experiences with telekinesis. Catastrophic breakdowns of experimental equipment would inexplicably occur when he was around. It was often joked about, but other scientists feared his presence during experiments because it was commonly believed he was the cause. This is well known in physics as “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_effect" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Pauli Effect</a>.”</p>
<p>Together they helped pioneer the study of parapsychology. Others studying non-material or fringe science also advanced the field (sometimes unknowingly) by the very nature of their work. Pauli’s early work in quantum physics had a strong influence by changing how we think about matter itself.</p>
<p>A great example of good solid theory is Rupert Sheldrake’s “<a href="http://www.sheldrake.org/Articles&amp;Papers/papers/morphic/morphic_intro.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">morphic fields</a>.” He shows us how fields create relationships. Physicist David Bohm’s “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Implicate and Explicate Order</a>” as previously mentioned. Michael Talbot’s famous “Holographic Universe” or Physicist David Peat’s “<a href="http://www.fdavidpeat.com/bibliography/essays/fzmean.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Meaning and Form</a>.” All of these hypothesize a substratum beneath our material and temporal reality.  Much of quantum physics is competing theory and it’s the same with non-material science.</p>
<p>Consciousness itself cannot be scientifically quantified &#8211; there is no explaining it. Many believe it exists outside the brain, perhaps the <a href="http://www.learning-mind.com/how-the-concept-of-the-akashic-records-demonstrates-that-everything-is-connected/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Akashic field</a>. Psi-fields, source fields, the flow, these are all conceptual dimensions bound together by abstract relationships. Where consciousness and matter are two aspects of the same thing. These are the domains of the trickster gods where Hermes and <a href="http://norse-mythology.org/gods-and-creatures/the-aesir-gods-and-goddesses/loki/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Loki</a> conspire to fool us using mind, matter and meaning.</p>
<p><a href="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Loki-trickster.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7526" src="https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Loki-trickster.jpg" alt="Loki trickster" width="245" height="215" /></a></p>
<p>Ok, and although I’m in agreement with many of these theorists about some hypothetical matrix. <strong>What is the intelligence behind the curtain?</strong></p>
<p>Since before recorded history humankind has recognized the existence of a greater intelligence. Ask any believer of any esoteric system and you’ll get many different answers. The spirit, God, the Goddess, Sophie, Allah, the Demiurge, The One. History’s greatest scientists came to this same conclusion. Einstein said: <em>“Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe &#8211; a spirit vastly superior to that of man.”</em></p>
<p>Also Max Planck the father of quantum physics said: <em>“All matter originates and exists, only by virtue of a force. We must assume behind this force is the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”</em> Isaac Newton believed the universe was mechanical, set into motion by God and then left to run. There are others who believe that all existence is an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanationism" target="_blank" rel="noopener">emanation</a> of God. Some don’t believe there is an external intelligence at all. This is not my belief!</p>
<p>What many of these theories and beliefs have in common, is that your own thoughts can alter the outside world in relation to you. Though, you alone are not the creator within the flow of the source field. You are simply part of the process. The biggest secret is not that there is a co-creator, but that it’s YOU! Ultimately there is a separate coordinating intelligence in control.</p>
<p>This is what causes events to coincide without your thoughts, like for instance, the moment of my birth: 3333. That’s why we pray or chant, recite mantras, sing praises and invoke &#8211; expecting a particular outcome. Deep down inside we’ve always known we were being watched, even in an empty room, we are never really alone. How many times do events align that seem so strange and statistically unlikely to have occurred by chance? They must originate externally. This means, that The Source or The-One controlling it all is out there and not within…</p>
<p><em>“Synchronicity is God’s way of remaining anonymous.” </em>&#8212; Albert Einstein</p>
<p><strong>This article was written using excerpts and concepts from the non-fiction book “Sin Thesis” available at </strong><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sin-Thesis-Robert-Torres/dp/1500462136/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1407134752&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=sin+thesis" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Amazon</strong></a><strong> written by the author Robert Torres. <a href="https://about.me/Towers3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://about.me/Towers3</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
